As I learn more of what ails our world, I am convinced we are no longer in a battle of “Democrats” vs. “Republicans”. In fact, I might even stop mentioning either of those two parties. Long gone are the days where we debate issues such as the economy, federal deficit, taxes, or welfare reform. Logical debates to decide which party or candidate to support are rarely conducted. Two sides have been drawn, those who want to follow Biblical morals and those who do not. Those who believe in Divine creation and those who believe in the Big Bang and Evolution.
Global Elites, the “Davos Crowd” as I have heard them recently described, are made up almost entirely of those who have rejected religion and believe mankind is in complete control of its destiny. These people often make comments that the world is overpopulated, and that population control is much needed for the survival of the planet. In lieu of believing in the God found in the Bible they tend to believe that the Earth is to be worshiped above all else. Mankind is viewed as detrimental and an impediment to achieving a utopia where there is no pollution, global warming is stopped, poverty and hunger are eliminated, and a host of other problems eliminated.
“We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now” – Sir David Attenborough, UK Television Presenter
The flaw in these individuals thinking is they miss that this world is inherently sinful due to man’s fallen and sinful nature. They believe that mankind can continue to evolve to perfection and can become like God’s themselves. In my opinion mankind will never evolve into perfection, and in fact, is already showing a slowdown in our progress as we have moved further away from God. The rejection of God, and the feeling that we are in control and can somehow save the world through our own willpower and intelligence is the fundamental misunderstanding in the Global Elite’s theories.
There is a consensus among the Global Elites that overpopulation is the primary cause of the most important problems facing the world and that they alone should be given totalitarian power to solve these issues. They believe that humans are a plague upon the earth and will destroy the earth unless population is reigned in and power is consolidated to the top echelon of society. Many of these people look up to China’s government as a role model for other countries to follow and if they were only given complete control, they could mandate the changes that are needed for our world.
“To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied” – Paul Ehrlich, Author of the best selling book “The Population Bomb”
Let me state that I do feel people should be responsible in the number of children they bring into the world and to have the ability to take care of the child they have produced. Before the welfare reform of the 1960’s only 24% of black babies in the United States were born out of wedlock but today the percentage is nearly 75%. For all races, the percentage is over 40%, a staggering number considering the size of the US. This breakdown in the family is one of the biggest problems in the world and is a common factor when you look at incarcerated people, uneducated, or those struggling with drug addiction.
My solution is to look at why traditional marriage and families are breaking down and find ways to reduce the trend of out of wedlock births. There are other ways to control population and insure the health and well being of people other than the premeditated death or murder of unwanted or undesired people.
Take the time to read about the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger. Sanger was closely associated with the Eugenics movement of the time and was incredibly dark and racist. She openly wrote about the need to control the population of certain types of people or races. She had a close relationship with Havelock Ellis who served for many years as Vice President of the Eugenics Education Society, a society that believed that “better breeding” was the key to building a better world. There is a forgotten and surprising connection in the American Eugenics Movement and the Nazi’s.
During the ’20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany’s fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. “There is today one state,” wrote Hitler, “in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception of immigration are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States.” This is hard to believe but do some home work and you find this movement was real and was deeply considered by many in the US as the way to a better tomorrow. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1796
“All of our problems are the result of over breeding among the working class” – Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood Founder
In promoting birth control, she advanced a controversial “Negro Project,” wrote in her autobiography about speaking to a Ku Klux Klan group and advocated for a eugenics approach to breeding for “the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extinction, of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
Here is a link to an article on Margaret Sanger, one of many you can find:
Charles Darwin in many ways started the eugenics movement and when he proposed his theory of evolution, it was hailed by many as the end of any scientific justification for the existence of a Creator God. Science was now freed from having to conform to ‘outdated’ Biblical ideas and thus could now bring in new enlightened ideas on how humans could continue to evolve to perfection. The theory of Eugenics, that many classified as a religion, came into being.
A group arose called the ‘Social Darwinists’ and, taking their cue from evolutionary theory, they divided humanity into the ‘fit’ and the ‘unfit’. The Social Darwinists, however, have not gone away, but rather have rebranded themselves and learned to present themselves as helpers to the poor, to the environment, and society. These are the Global Elites that make up the vast membership of the World Economic Forum, The United Nations, and the World Health Organization.
It is hard to believe that today’s global elites believe in the same eugenics principals that were adopted by the Adolph Hitler, by Joseph Stalin of Russia, Mao Zedong of China, or Pol Pot of Cambodia. But they very much do. A question I would have for them is who gets to survive and who makes the decision on these winners or losers. Will global elites such as Bill Gates, who has spoken numerous times about population control, be on the chopping block or will they just be the ones who dole out the execution orders?
“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, Founder CNN
These elites warn that if nothing is done about the exploding population, we will be facing a future full of poverty, war and suffering on a filthy, desolate planet.
“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Costeau
They complain that it “costs too much” to keep elderly patients that are terminally ill alive, and they eagerly promote abortion for babies that are “not wanted” because they would be “too much of a burden” on society. And for those that have a mental illness or have become drug addicted Canada has made it even easier by paying for medically assisted suicides for just about any reason. https://www.foxnews.com/world/canadian-religious-leaders-speak-out-country-set-allow-euthanasia-mental-illness
Canada legalized euthanasia in June 2016, where it is called MAiD, which stands for medical assistance in dying. Canada was not the first country to embrace euthanasia: Belgium and the Netherlands were the first to legalize the practice in 2002, Luxembourg and Colombia followed, Canada, and in 2021 Spain and New Zealand became the latest countries to do so.
Many of these countries are making it even easier to qualify for these programs with Canada accepting 97% of the applications. In 2021 over 10,000 Canadians lost their lives through MAiD, a 33% increase over the prior year. It used to be that only terminally ill patients would qualify but now poverty is being accepted as a reason that your life should be ended. Even though nothing is wrong with a person they could qualify if they have lost their job, become homeless, or fallen into a debt they feel they cannot pay.
Doesn’t this sound exactly like Nazi Germany?
https://www.deseret.com/2022/11/25/23471526/canada-euthanasia-medical-assistance-in-dying-poverty
Anything that reduces the human population in any way is a good thing for those that believe in this philosophy. This twisted philosophy is being promoted in our movies, in our television shows, in our music, in countless books, on many of the most prominent websites in the world, and it is being taught at nearly all the most important colleges and universities on the planet. The people promoting this philosophy are some of the wealthiest and most influential people on the planet and seem to be convinced that they are helping to “save the world” by trying to reduce the size of the human population. In fact, many of them are convinced that we are in a “life or death” struggle for the fate of the planet, and that if humanity does not willingly choose to embrace population control soon, then a solution will have to be “forced” upon them.
Here are a few notable quotes worth considering:
“I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded, and we need to promote death.” – Bill Maher, HBO personality
“Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.” – Philip Cafaro, Colorado State University Professor in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”
“I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.” – Eric R. Pianka, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin
“WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.” – Steven Rattner, Democrat strategist
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”- Ruth Bader Ginsburg, U.S. Supreme Court Justice
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” – Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood Founder
“All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.” – Mary Elizabeth Williams, Salon columnist
“When circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.” – Alberto Giubilini, Professor Monash University in Melbourne, Australia
“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.” – Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.” – John P. Holdren, Barack Obama’s primary science adviser
“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” – David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, Former Russian President
“If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die” – Pentti Linkola, Finnish environmentalist
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” – Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund